Ukraine conscripts 50.000 women into the army according to reports, while a prosecutor said the country lost 500.000 men, and is ‘bleeding’ 30.000 per month. The women won’t be employed as nurses only, and Russian reports about finding trenches full of dead women are no longer to be discarded as propaganda. Will it change the outcome of the war itself? I can’t see how. But I do understand the propaganda value if the goal is to trick NATO-countries into joining the battle by artificially creating an outrage. ‘We can’t let these women die for our beloved NATO!’
Now, at the start of the war, I saw this video-presentation of how the war would develop if NATO would jump right in, and save Ukraine. It presented those who watched it with a ‘likely’ scenario, according to those who made the video, of NATO kicking out the Russians in a matter of days. I’m no military expert equipped with NATO-goggles, or I would have been wrong like most of them about almost everything related to this war like they have been. But I do not have a privileged source in the Kremlin either. And although I felt it was not too difficult to predict what war between Russia and NATO on Ukrainian soil, using Ukrainian proxies, western weapons and ‘advisers’ would be like: A replay of the 2014 disaster when Porochenko, with NATO general Ben Hodges and others as his advisers, led his troops to defeat at Debalseve, I feel an all-out war between NATO and Russia is highly unpredictable, and it could go nuclear in a matter of minutes. If that happens, we’re all toast. Remember that old instruction movie about what to do in case of a nuclear war? Position yourself under the table. Head between your legs. Then kiss your ass goodbye.
It is my assumption that if NATO joins the fight, whether it would be ‘full frontal’, no holds barred, or through trying to ‘impose’ a ‘no fly zone’, that odd things would happen that did not fit into the scenarios NATO is using to predict the consequences. All over the place worried European experts are throwing their weight behind warnings related to the time an individual country would be capable to hold out if the Russians invaded, given their dwindling stocks. But why would the Russians invade a country like Belgium? Would they be using paratroopers to bypass other NATO-countries? Why would they set foot ashore in the UK? Who would like to be responsible for the mess those countries are making of everyday life as it is? Germany is occupied by farmers, truckers and bikers, and the trains won’t run because of a strike, as the entire country is hurling into the abyss of economic depletion. A lady from Germany promoting the ‘WEF’/‘WHO’-agenda received a standing ovation in one of the major Dutch newspapers, the ‘Volkskrant’, for advocating in favor of a ‘war economy’, rationing food and everything else. Not to defeat Russia, but to prevent a ‘climate disaster’. The Gates groomed and appointed head of the ‘WHO’ says the same thing, and countries around the world signed on the dotted line to provide Gates’ ‘WHO’ with absolute control over ‘Health Policies’ in their countries. Meat? No. I’m sorry, that went off the menu to save the climate, despite Gates’ mRNA-based injections to reduce the emission of methane from farting cows. And I'm not even kidding. I wrote it before, and I’ll say it again: If you’d say that they contracted the Russians to destroy Europe, I wouldn’t say that it sounds silly. It doesn’t. Save for the fact that I do not think that Putin would sign such a contract. So what is going on?
The people from the ‘WEF’ and ‘WHO’ have plans, and it is obvious to me that they need us to be scared, and not paying too much attention to what they are planning behind our backs. It is possible, I guess, that for them this entire war in Ukraine, as well as any other war we kicked into being since the beginning of this century, is merely meant to be a distraction. Although the associated loss of life and wealth does dovetail with those plans, aimed at reducing the number of people on the face of the earth, to save the climate, of course, and reduce consumption so there will be plenty for those who deserve it, our leaders. But growing wealth and awareness in Russia, China, India, and multiple other countries around the globe that this mighty NATO really is no threat to anyone, but the NATO-countries and their friends, can’t be part of the plan, right? Gates? Soros? Blackrock? All those ‘Young Global Leaders’ and ‘Agenda Contributors’ doubling as European Commission members and prime ministers, working for Xi Jinping and Putin? Yet…..
From what I’m looking at, it sure strikes me as less far fetched than this ‘Russia-Gate’ hoax or even this ‘January 6’-thing, after I watched a clip featuring the daughter of Nancy Pelosi, married to a Dutch ‘journalist’, who was already identified in pictures in front of the Capitol on that fateful day, and a guy from ‘Antifa’ inside the Capitol, filming this ‘storming’ from the inside, knowing that Pelosi herself rejected reinforcing security around the building. Heck! What about ‘9/11’? Scores of fascists in Bologna raising their arm in unison, likely encouraged by NATO’s ‘liberation’ of Ukraine as a far-right bulwark to teach Putin, as they have no qualms about arming head-choppers looking to establish a Caliphate either, right? As long as they do not inconvenience our leaders? Am I being led down a rabbit hole here? Or do I need to worry about some kind of superior intelligence playing all of us like a fiddle? Aliens at a Miami shopping mall? Really? Or some holographic ‘Abba’-experience? But if so, then why? Orthodox Jews in underground tunnels below a synagoge in New York, struggling with the cops as they raid the place? Secret cabals? Six hundred dams removed in Europe to restore nature, and you wonder why there is wide spread flooding in the Netherlands when it rains upstream? And not even the mass protests in Germany, or the flood of people entering the US just in time for the ballot, since you don’t need a photo-ID and you are allowed to vote by mail in that ‘democracy’, generate much attention, if at all. Yes, it is inconvenient. Yes, we’ll look into it. Now watch the ’news’ about the ‘Golden Globes’ and people skating while it is freezing cold, and forget that we said the planet is ‘warming’ for a moment.
We need a new narrative, that’s what I think. A reliable moral compass. Solid science. Something that is no longer held hostage by madmen in uniform and dangerous criminals, supported by producers of written lies, fake images, manipulated ‘proof’, ‘AI’-enhanced propaganda videos, and ‘experts’ taking the wrong medicine, talking out of the back of their heads. Without it, it is entirely feasible that NATO will jump right in as Ukraine is being battered, but not to save the country, or the people, but to reduce ‘carbon emissions’ to make you stop breathing, laid to rest in the hole you dug, and make room for whatever they are planning to do with that piece or real estate you are presently occupying.