Multiple warheads struck Israel during the recent attack by Iran. Despite the efforts of Israel, and her NATO allies, and Jordan, to intercept them. Reportedly the total cost to Israel and its allies in spent inventory was 1.3 Billion Dollars, since these missiles and aircraft, with their support, don’t come cheap. And to be on the safe side, you need to fire multiple interceptor-missiles at every single target. By the looks of it, Iran, and its partners in Lebanon and Yemen, used cheap drones, and older cruise missiles to ‘bleed’ Israel and its partners, while saturating the systems used for operational purposes. But from videos provided professional military analysts learned that Iran apparently masters the ability to produce missiles with a terminal phase boost, rendering them hypersonic, and there were videos which suggest that some of the warheads used are able to maneuver in the terminal phase, to avoid air defense missiles fired at them.
While Iran claims to have struck two military airbases, and a secret Mossad base on the Golan, killing at least 44 agents located at that position, Israel and western sources claim that those warheads which did make it through struck empty desert, and did no damage at all, while 99% of everything fired at Israel was intercepted and destroyed. Based on this last claim, Israel’s allies urge Netanyahu to declare victory, and move on. Iran already said it is satisfied with the result, and that they will leave it at this. Unless Israel decides to escalate. Multiple sources claim that Netanyahu is under pressure to escalate, and the US hinted that if Israel decides to strike Iran, the US will back them anyway, slavishly doing whatever Netanyahu expects them to do. ‘Yes Benjamin. Sure Benjamin. As you wish, Benjamin.’
This collective performance by Israel and NATO, and the subsequent claim that 99% of all the incoming projectiles had been destroyed, enraged Ukraine. Why, if NATO was willing, and according to their own statements, able to protect Israel, didn’t they help Ukraine? Kirby answered that one, stating that it was a different conflict, and that Israel was small, and Ukraine huge. But clearly Ukraine is not as important to the ‘White House’ as Israel is, which dovetails with my own claim that Ukraine is merely of importance to NATO as bait for the Russians, while Israel is generally considered to be a US ‘protectorate’ ever since president Johnson and the Israelis fooled the American public with this attack on the USS Liberty, the ‘Mother of all False Flag Operations’.
Like many observers I think that the damage done by those warheads which did make it past the ‘Iron Dome’ is not merely some scratches and potholes in the Negev desert, but that it is kept under wraps. In other words, even if NATO stepped in to help Ukraine, the targets the Russians want to destroy will be destroyed regardless. And if it really did cost NATO and Israel 1.3 Billion to save Israel from this single attack, there wouldn’t be enough money in the whole wide world to protect Ukraine from continuous barrages of drones and missiles, while the hypersonic projectiles can’t be stopped anyway by the looks of it. These are simple, practical considerations, apart from the fact that NATO doesn’t have the amount of air defense systems required and would have to abandon the protection of certain objects on their own territory. Being stretched from the tip of the Red Sea to the border with Poland as it is, while failing to perform sufficiently against even the less sophisticated threat of the Houthi's, is a headache for NATO.
While Ukraine is finished on the battlefield by the looks of it, due to lack of men, equipement and ammo, as well as stupid choices by those in command to begin with, with reports of large groups of soldiers either surrendering to the advancing Russians, to prevent being wiped out by FAB-ordnance, or refusing to fight, and withdrawing, including Azov-battalions of elite fighters, who do not trust Syrsky, or Zelensky, or NATO with its empty promises and glib-talking politicians, the country apparently did score a hit with longer range missiles on the Crimean peninsula, hitting a military base and destroying crucial air defense systems located there. The military significance vis a vis the stated objective of Ukraine to regain territory lost since the 2014 coup, which brought Ukraine into the orbit of NATO, is zilch, nada, nothing as far as I can see. It might expose naval bases in the Black Sea to attacks, using ‘Neptune’ cruise missiles, apparently now with an extended range of 1000 kilometers, as well as the bridge over the Kerch strait, for some sort of ‘PR-victory’, while making the war more costly for Russia, but Ukraine acting in this way is not serving its own people, only NATO. Why would they do that?
Why would you even consider to serve the Boss who is taking you for granted, and treats you like a slave? Rumor has it that the US is, after all, preparing an ‘aid package’ to Ukraine, which will be offered as a ‘loan’. Imagine. Think about it. Money for your own funeral, to be repaid by your children, as you go on a suicide mission for the Boss. This is why I wrote on ‘X’, commenting on protests in Tbilisi, Georgia, that it looks like a Death Cult. The government in Georgia is proposing a ‘FARA’-law, demanding that lobbyists and activists working for ‘NGO’s’ paid by foreign governments and ‘WEF’-connected billionaires, open the books to provide insight into who is pulling their strings. The opposition is up in arms, and a hooligan-politician physically attacked a politician of the ruling party in parliament, because this is seen as a ‘Russian’ law. Yes, Russia introduced a similar law to the ‘FARA’-law in the US, which was introduced in 1937, and the EU will present its version in May. Transparency is a good thing, right? I don’t have anything to hide myself, since all my opinions posted are my own, and I’m not getting paid for any of it, by nobody. I’m paying all the bills out of my own pocket as a pensioner. Others need to be supplemented by income from various sources, which is okay, as long as we know, right? There are people who post content targeted at a certain audience while promoting a certain product, and as long as we know they get paid by ‘Brand A’, we know why he or she is not mentioning the competition.
The ‘reasoning’ behind these protests against this Georgian law defy logic, where these protestors insist that they shouldn’t be asked to declare anything, because they are the ‘Good Guys’. No, if you are the ‘Good People’, you would have no problem whatsoever to say who you are working for. It would make you proud. Unless this Boss was not playing by the rules, throwing in regime change efforts, and snipers targeting protestors as well as police, as they did on the Maidan, and in Syria and Libya. And look at the result! You don’t want to go there, right? Wrong, apparently. Some people can’t wait. Why?