Many decades ago, researchers ran experiments in a lab with colonies of mice. As expected, colonies of mice provided with plenty of food and comfort began to expand rapidly. Until they reached an invisible barrier. Reproduction stagnated, fertility dropped, and they began to attack other mice, including their own kin. For reasons unknown, because we cannot know what these mice were thinking, right? The existence of a maximum sustained level of subjects was not totally unexpected. But this ceiling was not associated with increasing scarcity, save for 'living space'. The researchers kept them fed with plenty of food, and otherwise comfortable conditions. No 'ice-age', out-of-bounds polution, or 'global warming'. Just overcrowded.
You would expect that this would be a ceiling, and the population would not expand further, staying at that level. But that was not what happened. The population began to *shrink* at an accelerating pace, and the last of the mice walked past all the food and delicacies the researchers offered to die alone. Well, that last bit is my liberty as a narrator, and not factually correct, because the researchers didn't wait that long, but the trend was crystal clear.
Again, we are not talking 'Club of Rome'-type scenario's where humanity is running out of stuff it needs to support further growth. Somehow enough was enough, and it was all downward from there. A 'Big Reset'.
Now, mankind and mice are not the same. We possess a 'superior' brain, capable of processing massive amounts of 'data' to find 'solutions'. Yet our 'animalistic' background is riding piggyback on that capacity, frequently interfering in unfavourable ways. This is, essentially, the age-old 'Nature/Nurture'-divide which has occupied scientists, as they tried to figure out the best way to merge the two. The very notion is not exactly 'rocket-science', but figuring out how to get past the 'Glass Ceiling', if at all possible, is another matter. No lack of theories and follow-up experiments, with certain individuals promoting the idea that we need to get rid of this 'nature' thing altogether, becoming 'cold-hearted' machines, relying on our rational capacity exclusively. Resulting in alledged 'Eugenists' like Epstein, Gates, and others in that 'Network', preceded by generations of like-minded people, careful to mask their true feelings and intentions, and using outspoken 'hedonists', like Trump and the Clintons, just to name two of the most greedy thieves with no observable conscience, to 'cull the herd'. Or that is what it looks like to me.
Things are never 'black versus white', so what things look like to me are not accusations, but observations of the *function* of these people. These people are 'Holding Hands', but they are not friends. They are condemned to use and abuse the 'others'. Do not pay *any* attention to their arguments. They lie, cheat, obscure, manipulate and 'nudge' 24/7, without breaking a sweat. They *loath* us, the 'common people'. And they surround themselves by cattle, mesmerised by 'influencers' like pop-stars. And in my first article published yesterday, titled 'Playing to destroy the world', I referred you to what was behind the birth of the 'pop-culture', killing vibrant popular movements seeking peace and respect for fellow human beings. Understand that I'm not accusing anyone, acknowledging that I myself never saw the all too familiar pattern of mass-manipulation until it was too late. I never did the drugs, never developed into an 'influencer', myself mesmerised by this or that particular 'star', but I think I have to thank my parents and 'libertarian' educators for that. And yes, no doubt, the 'professional pressure' throughout my career in a profession where 'BS' was a 'hitman' killing ambitions, hardware and people.
Note that I'm not trying to sell you some complex 'Conspiracy Theory', but the observation that certain people with a drive to cull the herd, and entirely selfish, hedonistic individuals with no conscience, are natural partners. Look at the 'Trump Administration' and larger 'Warparty', widely implicated as part of the 'Epstein Network', killing, stealing, pirating, sanctioning, lying, bullying without any remorse. That bunch is a necessary 'tool' in the hands of people who want to cull the herd. While those 'elitist insiders' need to be careful not to break it to the masses that they are the ones doing the 'planning'. Creating and spreading the virus, the drugs, the 'memes', while presenting themselves as running the World Health Organisation, and any score of widely recognised (tax exempt) 'Charities'. Cherry-picking among the 'young' to find the ones they need to 'preserve', before they are spoiled by the 'nurture' common in society as it has developed. Madmen, all of them. Women and men. Deranged and dangerous.
Yet, that research showing us that growing our collective wealth without putting the brake on it is an existential threat to *all* of mankind, is not 'fake news'. Moreover, with automation and robotisation rendering human labour superfluous, we are putting the 'turbo' on our capacity to grow our collective wealth, as evident in a country like China. So how to deflect the threat of decline? Fascinating problem, with many possible solutions, some of them tried before in 'local' affluent settings. On these pages I paid tribute to the work of Stanley Kubrick as a 'visionary', lately highlighting his last movie, 'Eyes Wide Shut', increasingly promoted as a movie in which Kubrick 'Tried to Warn Us'. In particular about 'secret societies', even as many suspect he was an 'insider', and not a 'whistleblower', who would be naming names and exposing criminal enterprises by going public. The 'explanation' provided by those who bought into that story is that it would have been way too dangerous for Kubrick to go public, so he *had* to do it in an underhanded way. Subsequently underpinned by pointing out that the original version was redacted, and that good old Stanley died six days after the screening of his original.
Could be suspicious, and yes, people hanging out with folks entangled in 'Epstein-' or 'Clinton Networks' died mysteriously, as you would expect, because the 'secret services' and crime-networks incorporated in both do not value life all that much. But what exactly was he revealing in that case? I mean, extremely decadent masked events, like THIS one at a de Rothschild property in 1972, were private, but not exactly secret events. And in that video there is a reference to a somewhat similar party in the US, organised by Andy Warhol, likely to have included even more sexual perverts than the French version, and it wouldn't surprise me if Kubrick had been present at both. And no doubt there were people present who thought they were entitled to run the world. Including more than a few listed in Whitney Webb's magnum opus 'One Nation Under Blackmail', networking to climb the ladder. But was that intentional? Was that by design? Like what 'MK-Ultra' did as it created the 'counter culture'? Or what president Johnson did when he did the 'Gulf of Tonkin'-hoax, and the 'USS Liberty False Flag' operation? Too far fetched if you ask me.
Complexity breeds complexity, and conspiracies breed new conspiracies. And before you know it, you are as mad as these madmen I identified above. To think of mankind as a species uniquely positioned to find solutions for all our problems, if only we use our brain, our unique ability to apply logic to challenges put before us, identifying the bottlenecks, and finding the qualified people to create 'work-arounds', or technological breakthroughs to simply expand our habitat, thus preventing this doom-scenario of unavoidable decline, releases us from thinking in mankind having a destiny. Free your mind. Do not drop out, but tune in.
Fertility rates in many parts of the 'developed' world are at an alarmingly low level. Moreover, infighting in that part of the world is on the rise. Abortion, euthanasia and homosexual relationships are promoted, as well as the creation of ultra-dense, meticulously controlled cities and 'processed' food for carefully monitored and controlled 'subjects', who are to vacate the surrounding nature where wild animals can roam freely. What kind of plan is that? And how does promoting the transfer of people from bombed out parts of the world to these concentration camps fit in? Which 'genius' came up with that plan? What kind of cruel experiment is this? And how does the war with Russia, and the war with Iran, resulting in food scarcity and travel restrictions, and soon more 'lockdowns', create the conditions our leaders are seeking for our own benefit?
That 'pressure cooker' may be just what the doctor ordered to cull the herd, but did you sign up to that? I didn't. I can work with others to find solutions. I do not hate Muslims, Jews, Russians, Chinese, or myself. I never dropped out, seeking shelter in my 'safe space', staring at my belly-button, but driven by curiosity of what other people were up to, I kept tuning in. Yes, of course I can see that this opulent masked ball at a de Rothschild residence in rural France, secluded from prying eyes, was decadent extravaganza. Would I have excepted an invitation? Who knows? Same thing with Warhol's competing party on the other side of the pond, while Americans and Vietnamese were dying in the service of expansionism, or defending against it to uphold the sovereignty and culture of Vietnam. I drifted through all kinds of 'circles' throughout my life, taking care not to become corrupted and enslaved. You should try it too. It is our only window to a future with no destiny. One adventurous road with challenges, and wise, or stupid decisions at the individual level which will blow your mind. And no, there is no lack of resources, only nefarious people who pretend to have the right to blow them up, unused, if we don't grant them possession, who should be in jail, or in a mental institution.